23-08-2010, 15:36
@ Anna4
och zu meinem letzen post:
Es würde mich auch mal interessieren, was Du zu einem anderen Absatz auf derselben Seite, bzw. dessen Seriosität, meinst:
[..] Of the 662 occurrences of the term Anatta in the Nikayas, its usage is restricted to referring to 22 nouns (forms, feelings, perception, experiences, consciousness, the eye, eye-consciousness, desires, mentation, mental formations, ear, nose, tongue, body, lusts, things unreal, etc.), all phenomenal, as being Selfless (anatta). Contrary to some popular books written outside the scope of Buddhist doctrine, there is no “Doctrine of anatta/anatman” mentioned anywhere in the sutras, [..]
och zu meinem letzen post:
Es würde mich auch mal interessieren, was Du zu einem anderen Absatz auf derselben Seite, bzw. dessen Seriosität, meinst:
[..] Of the 662 occurrences of the term Anatta in the Nikayas, its usage is restricted to referring to 22 nouns (forms, feelings, perception, experiences, consciousness, the eye, eye-consciousness, desires, mentation, mental formations, ear, nose, tongue, body, lusts, things unreal, etc.), all phenomenal, as being Selfless (anatta). Contrary to some popular books written outside the scope of Buddhist doctrine, there is no “Doctrine of anatta/anatman” mentioned anywhere in the sutras, [..]